Jamais je ne serais allé chercher dans cette famille !
Mais c'est quand même l'avantage du forum, si on l'a déjà rencontrée (jolies, les photos en galerie), cela aide grandement.
Bonjour,
Je suis en train de trier quelques photos et je suis retombé sur ce post.
J'avais oublié de vous donner la réponse de Paul Beuk, voilà : " The Stegana I identified as S. hypoleuca but with some reservations. The specimen is exactly at the separation level of 4 mm wing length given in the European key. A second character given, the number of rows of acrostichal setae is a kind of tricky as the rows are somewhat irregular. Hence the distinction between 12 or 14 is not easy. Moreover, perhaps increased size make it possible to have more rows of acrostichal setae. In taxa with rather scattered acrostichal setae this is not unheared of. Stiull, most characters seem to point to the couplet with the two larger species of Stegana (Steganina). The then remaining characters seem to point at S. hypoleuca but the clincher would be male genitalia. However, this was a female..."
Bonne journée.