...............................................................................................................
[/barre]Bibliographie :
- Sites : Fauna Europaea, Wikispecies, Wikipedia, Encyclopedy Of Life, NCBI, Tree Of Life web project.
- Abele et al., 1989 - Molecular evidence for inclusion of the phylum Pentastomida in the Crustacea - Mol. Biol. Evol. 6: 685-691 (pdf)
- Aleshin et al., 2009 - On the Phylogenetic Position of Insects in the Pancrustacea
- Anderson, 1973 - Embryology and phylogeny in annelids and arthropods - Pergamon Press, Oxford.
- Babbitt & Patel, 2005 - Relationships within the Pancrustacea: Examining the influence of additional Malacostracan 18S and 28S rDNA - In “Crustacea and Arthropod Relationships” (Koenemann, S. & R. A. Jenner, eds.) Taylor & Francis, Davis, CA. pp. 275-294 (article umérique)
- Ballard et al., 1992 - Evidence from 12S ribosomal RNA sequences that Onychophorans are modified arthropods - Science 258: 1345-1348 (pdf)
- Bitsch & Bitsch, 1998 - Internal anatomy and phylogenetic relationships among apterygote insect clades (Hexapoda) - Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. (N. S.) 34: 339–363 (abstract)
- Boore et al., 1995 - Deducing the pattern of arthropod phylogeny from mitochondrial DNA réarrangements - Nature, 1995, 376: 163-165 (pdf)
- Boore et al., 1998 - Gene translocation links insects and crustaceans - Nature 392: 667–668 (pdf)
- Bourlat et al., 2008 [2] - Testing the new animal phylogeny: a phylum level molecular analysis of the animal kingdom - Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 49: 23–31 (lien vers pdf)
- Cameron et al., 2004 - Mitochondrial genome data alone are not enough to unambiguously resolve the relationships of Entognatha, Insecta and Crustacea sensu lato (Arthropoda) - Cladistics 20, 534–557 (lien vers pdf)
- Carapelli et al., 2007 - Phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial protein coding genes confirms the reciprocal paraphyly of Hexapoda and Crustacea - BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: S8 (pdf)
- Colgan et al., 1998 - Histone H3 and U2 snRNA sequences and arthropod molecular evolution - Aust. J. Zool. 46, 419–437 (abstract)
- Cook et al., 2001 [3] - Hox genes and the phylogeny of the arthropods - Current Biology 11: 759–763 (pdf)
- Cook et al., 2004 - Mitochondrial genomes suggest that hexapods and crustaceans are mutually paraphyletic - Proceedings of the Royal Society B 272, 1295–1304 (pdf)
- deRosa et al., 1999 [4] - Hox genes in brachiopods and priapulids and protostome evolution - Nature, 1999, 399: 772-776 (pdf)
- Dunlop & Arango, 2004 - Pycnogonid affinities: a review - Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 43: 8–21 (lien vers pdf)
- Dunn et al., 2008 [5] - Broad
- Edgecombe, 2010 [1] - Arthropod phylogeny: An overview from the perspectives of morphology, molecular data and the fossil record - Arthropod Structure & Development, 2010, 39: 74–87 (pdf)
- Edgecombe et al., 2000 [7] - Arthropod cladistics: combined analysis of histone H3 and U2 snRNA sequences and morphology - Cladistics, 2000, 16: 155-203 (pdf)
- Edgecombe et al., 2003 - The mandibular gnathal edges: Homologous structures throughout Mandibulata? - Afr. Invert. 44: 115–135 (lien vers pdf)
- Friedrich & Tautz, 1995 - Ribosomal DNA phylogeny of the major extant arthropod classes and the evolution of myriapods - Nature, 2002, 376: 165–167 (abstract)
- Fryer, 1996 - Reflections on arthropod evolution - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 58: 1–55 (abstract)
- Giribet et al., 1996 [6] - First molecular evidence for the existence of a tardigrada + arthropoda
- Giribet et al., 1999 - Internal phylogeny of the Chilopoda (Myriapoda, Arthropoda) using complete 18S rDNA and partial 28S rDNA sequences - Phil.Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B (1999) 354: 215-222 (pdf)
- Giribet et al., 2001 - Arthropod phylogeny based on eight molecular loci and morphology - Nature 413: 157–161 (lien vers pdf)
- Giribet et al., 2005 - The position of crustaceans within Arthropoda – evidence from nine molecular loci and morphology - In: Koenemann, S., Jenner, R. (Eds.), Crustacea and Arthropod Relationships. Crustacean Issues, 16. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, pp. 307–352 (lien vers pdf)
- Giribet & Edgecombe, 2013 - The Arthropoda: A Phylogenetic Framework - Arthropod Biology and Evolution, 2013, IX: 17-40 (lien vers pdf)
- Giribet & Ribera, 1998 - The position of arthropods in the animal kingdom: a search for a reliable outgroup for internal arthropod phylogeny - Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9: 481–488 (abstract)
- Giribet & Ribera, 2000 - A review of arthropod phylogeny: new data based on ribosomal DNA sequences and direct character optimization - Cladistics, 2000, 16: 204-231 (abstract)
- Giribet & Wheeler, 1999 - The Position of Arthropods in the Animal Kingdom: Ecdysozoa, Islands, Trees, and the ‘‘Parsimony Ratchet’’ - Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 1999, 13(3): 619–623 (lien vers pdf)
- Hassanin, 2006 - Phylogeny of Arthropoda inferred from mitochondrial sequences: strategies for limiting the misleading effects of multiple changes in pattern and rates of substitution - Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 38: 100–116 (lien vers pdf)
- Hwang et al., 2001 - Mitochondrial protein phylogeny joins myriapods and chelicerates - Nature 413: 154–157 (abstract)
- Ishiwata et al., 2011 - Phylogenetic relationships among insect orders based on three nuclear protein-coding gene sequences - Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2011, 58(2): 169–180 (abstract)
- Jager et al., 2006 - Homology of arthropod anterior appendages revealed by Hox gene expression in a sea spider - Nature 441: 506–508 (lien vers pdf)
- Jarvis et al., 2012 - Evolving specialization of the arthropod nervous system - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109: 10634–10639 (pdf)
- Jenner, 2010 - Higher-level crustacean phylogeny: Consensus and conflicting hypotheses - Arthropod Structure & Development, 2010, 39: 143-153 (abstract)
- Kjer, 2004 - Aligned 18S and Insect Phylogeny - Syst. Biol., 2004, 53(3): 506–514 (pdf)
- Klass & Kristensen, 2001 - The ground plan and affinities of hexapods: Recent progress and open problems - Ann. Soc. Ent, 2001, 37(1-2): 265-298 (abstract)
- Koenemann et al., 2010 - Arthropod phylogeny revisited, with a focus on crustacean relationships - Arthropod Structure & Development, 2010, 39: 88–110 (pdf)
- Kristensen, 1997 - The groundplan and
- Kusche et al., 2003 - Complete subunit sequences, structure and evolution of the 6 6-mer hemocyanin from the common house centipede, Scutigera coleoptrata - European Journal of Biochemistry 270: 2860–2868 (pdf)
- Kusche & Burmester, 2001 - Diplopod hemocyanin sequence and the phylogenetic position of the Myriapoda - Molecular Biology and Evolution 18: 1566–1573 (pdf)
- Machida, 2006 - Evidence from embryology for reconstructing the relationships of hexapod
- Mallatt et al, 2004 - Ecdysozoan phylogeny and Bayesian inference: first use of nearly complete 28S and 18S rRNA gene sequences to classify the arthropods and their kin - Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31: 178–191 (pdf)
- Mallatt & Giribet, 2006 - Further use of nearly complete 28S and 18S rRNA genes to classify Ecdysozoa: 37 more arthropods and a kinorhynch - Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 40: 772–794 (abstract)
- Masta et al., 2009 - Arachnid relationships based on mitochondrial genomes: asymmetric nucleotide and amino acid bias affects phylogenetic analyses - Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 2009, 50(1): 117-128 (abstract)
- Nardi et al., 2003 - Hexapod origins: monophyletic or paraphyletic? - Science 299: 1887–1889 (pdf)
- Negrisolo et al., 2004 - The mitochondrial genome of the house centipede scutigera and the monophyly versus paraphyly of myriapods - Mol. Biol. Evol. 21: 770–780 (lien vers pdf)
- Paulus, 1999 - Phylogeny of the Myriapoda ± Crustacea ± Insecta: a new attempt using photoreceptor structure - Presented at the Phylogenetic Symposium in Vienna/Austria from 19th to 21st November 1999 (pdf)
- Peters et al, 2014 - The evolutionary history of holometabolous insects inferred from transcriptome-based phylogeny and comprehensive morphological data - BMC Evolutionary Biology, 2014, 14: 52 (pdf)
- Petrov & Vladychenskaya, 2005 - Phylogeny of molting protostomes (Ecdysozoa) as inferred from 18S and 28S rRNA gene sequences - Molecular Biology 39: 503–513 (pdf)
- Pisani et al., 2004 - The colonization of land by animals: molecular phylogeny and divergence times among arthropods - BioMed Central Biology 2: 1–10 (pdf)
- Regier et al., 2005-1 - Pancrustacean phylogeny: hexapods are terrestrial crustaceans and maxillopods are not monophyletic - Proc. R. Soc. B, 2005, 272: 395–401 (pdf)
- Regier et al., 2005-2 - Phylogenetic analysis of Myriapoda using three nuclear protein-coding genes - Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2005, 34: 147–158 (pdf)
- Regier et al., 2008 - Resolving arthropod phylogeny: exploring phylogenetic signal within 41 kb of proteincoding nuclear gene sequences - Systematic Biology 57: 920–938 (pdf)
- Regier et al., 2010 - Arthropod relationships revealed by phylogenomic analysis of nuclear protein-coding sequences - Nature, 2010, 463: 1079-1083 (abstract)
- Regier & Shultz, 1997 - Molecular phylogeny of the major arthropod groups indicates polyphyly of crustaceans and a new hypothesis for the origin of hexapods - Mol Biol Evol, 1997, 14: 902-913 (pdf)
- Rota-Stabelli & Telford, 2008 - A multi criterion approach for the selection of optimal outgroups in phylogeny: Recovering some support for Mandibulata over Myriochelata using mitogenomics - Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 48: 103–111 (abstract)
- Scholtz & Kamenz, 2006 - The book lungs of Scorpiones and Tetrapulmonata (Chelicerata, Arachnida): evidence for homology and a single terrestrialisation event of a common arachnid ancestor - Zoology 109: 2–13 (abstract)
- Schram, 1978 - Arthropods: a convergent phenomenon - Fieldiana Geology, 1978, 39: 61–108 (pdf)
- Schram & Hof, 1998 - Fossils and the interrelationships of major crustacean groups - In “Arthropod Fossils and Phylogeny” (G. D. Edgecombe, Ed.), pp. 233–302. Columbia Univ. Press, New York
- Schram & Koenemann, 2004 - Are the crustaceans monophyletic? - Cracraft, J., Donoghue, J. (Eds.), Assembling the Tree of Life. Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 319–329 (article numérique)
- Shultz, 2007 - A phylogenetic analysis of the arachnid orders based on morphological characters - Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2007, 150:221–265 (pdf)
- Simonetta, 2004 - Are the traditional classes of arthropods natural ones? Recent advances in palaeontology and some considerations on morphology - Italian Journal of Zoology, 2004, 71(3): 247-264 (pdf)
- Spears & Abele, 1997 - Crustacean phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA - In “Arthropod Relationships” (R. A. Fortey and R. H. Thomas, Eds.), pp. 169–187. Chapman & Hall, London (article numérique)
- Stys et al., 1993 - Phylogeny of the Hexapoda and ovarian metamerism - Biol. Rev. 68: 365–379 (première page)
- Tiegs & Manton, 1958 - The evolution of the Arthropoda - Biological Reviews, 1958, 33(3): 255–333 (1ère page)
- Timmermans et al., 2008 - Revealing pancrustacean relationships: phylogenetic analysis of ribosomal protein genes places Collembola (springtails) in a monophyletic Hexapoda and reinforces the discrepancy between mitochondrial and nuclear DNA markers - BMC Evolutionary Biology 8: 83 (pdf)
- Turbeville et al., 1991 - The phylogenetic status of arthropods, as inferred from 18s rRNA sequences - Mol. Biol. Evol. 8: 669-686 (pdf)
- von Reumont et al., 2009 - Can comprehensive background knowledge be incorporated into substitution models to improve phylogenetic analyses? A case study on major arthropod relationships - BMC Evolutionary Biology 9, 119 (pdf)
- von Reumont et al., 2011 - Pancrustacean Phylogeny in the Light of New Phylogenomic Data: Support for Remipedia as the Possible Sister Group of Hexapoda - Mol. Biol. Evol., 2011 (pdf)
- Waloszek et al., 2007 - Evolution of cephalic feeding structures and the phylogeny of Arthropoda - Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2007, 254(1–2): 273–287 (lien vers pdf)
- Waloszek & Dunlop, 2002 - A larval sea spider (Arthropoda: Pycnogonida) from the Upper Cambrian ‘Orsten’ of Sweden, and the phylogenetic position of pycnogonids - Palaeontology 45: 421–446 (pdf)
- Weygoldt, 1998 - Evolution and systematics of the Chelicerata - Exp. Appl. Acarol. 22: 63–79 (pdf)
- Wheeler et al., 1993 - Arthropod phylogeny: a combined approach - Cladistics 9: 1–39 (lien vers pdf)
- Wheeler et al., 2001 - The Phylogeny of the Extant Hexapod Orders - Cladistics, 2001, 17: 113–169 (lien vers pdf)
- Wheeler & Hayashi, 1998 - The phylogeny of the extant chelicerate orders - Cladistics 14: 173–192 (pdf)
- Wille, 1960 - The phylogeny and relationships between the insect orders - Rev. biol. trop., 2002, 50(2): 735-766 (article numérique)
- Wills, 1997 - A phylogeny of recent and fossil Crustacea derived from morphological characters - In “Arthropod Relationships” (R. A. Fortey and R. H. Thomas, Eds.), pp. 189–203. Chapman & Hall, London (article numérique)
- Wills et al., 1998 - An arthropod phylogeny based on fossil and recent
- Zrzavy et al., 1997 - Arthropod phylogeny: taxonomic congruence, total evidence and conditional combination approaches to morphological and molecular data sets - In: Fortey, R.A., Thomas, R.H. (Eds.), Arthropod Relationships. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 97–107 (article numérique)