J'ai repris la clé:
-Metatarsus of mid leg of usual length [Fig. 2] ->
2
-Face completely covered with
pubescence or only with a very narrow shiny (brillant) longitudinal stripe [Fig. 4]->
3
-Lateral
marginal bristles (
soies) on
tergites (discal bristles) well-developed [Fig. 7], [Fig. 8]->
6
-At least
tergites tomentose [Fig. 19], [Fig. 20]->
7
Jusque là pas de problème je pense.
Pour le 7 léger doute sur "at least two last segments anterior to ovipositor shiny black"
-7a Postocular bristles (occipital bristles) long and sharply, bent anteriorly in right-angled medially [Fig. 21]; at least two last segments anterior to ovipositor shiny black [Fig. 22]->
Neoitamus
seul possible: 2aTergite 6 predominantly tomentose, only shiny dorsally; epandria short, more or less square, not as elongated as socius dorsally [Fig. 1]->
Neoitamus cothunatus
——> mais impasse,
Hypopygium - lateral colle pas
-7b Postocular bristles (occipital bristles) either weakly bent or straight [Fig. 23]; two last segments anterior to ovipositor tomentose [Fig. 24]->
8
Donc 8
-Dorsocentral and acrostichal bristles well-developed anterior (mais plutôt courts chez-moi) to
transverse suture [Fig. 27]; facial gibbosity well-developed (at least occupying lower half of face) NON [Fig. 28]->11
-Area around cross-veins not particularly darkened [Fig. 37]; postpedicel (3rd antennal segment) of usual length and shape [Fig. 38] (pas net) ->
12
Jusque là ca pourrait le faire.
Donc 12, mais là problème la séparation se fait sur la
or moi c'est un
n'est-ce pas?
-12a Ovipositors broad and short (wider than long), ventrally with densely arranged yellow hairs [Fig. 39], [Fig. 40]->
Antipalus varipes pourrait coller
Hypopygium
-12b Ovipositor laterally compressed (longer than wide) [Fig. 41], [Fig. 42]
Avant de continuer, merci de confirmer si c'est bien un mâle.